Most organisations know their testing process is broken. Few have quantified what it is actually costing them across labour, failures, compliance, and AI readiness.
⚠️ Labour Cost🔴 Release Failures📋 Compliance Burden🤖 AI Readiness Gap
Your Profile
Tell us about your environment
Total apps subject to UAT or validation
Full-time headcount dedicated to testing
End-to-end days per validation run
⚙️
Cost Driver 1
Labour & Manual Testing Overhead
Barclays identified this as a direct replacement for BCS Test Runner. The question is not just salary — it is the hidden cost of scripting, maintenance, and re-running failed cycles.
Include salary, benefits, overhead
$
Scripting + execution + re-runs
How many UAT runs per month across all apps
Time keeping old scripts alive vs. actual testing
🔴
Cost Driver 2
Production Failures & Release Risk
J&J highlighted packaging automation demand and governance gaps. Every failure that gets through incomplete UAT carries a direct cost — remediation, rollback, user impact, and reputational exposure.
Issues that UAT should have caught
Remediation, rollback, user impact, reputational cost
$
Planned releases that slipped because testing was not complete
Opportunity cost, SLA risk, competitive impact
$
📋
Cost Driver 3
Compliance & Audit Evidence Burden
MS Amlin specifically called out audit evidence as a pain point. Without automated audit trails, teams spend weeks manually compiling evidence before every compliance review.
SOC 2, ISO 27001, internal audits, etc.
Manual compilation, screenshots, email chains
IT + compliance + management time
$
Regulatory fines or remediation costs from audit failures
$
🤖
Cost Driver 4
AI Readiness Gap & Blocked Initiatives
M&T Bank is excited about Copilot integration and internal LLM usage — but non-deterministic AI outputs cannot be validated by manual or script-based UAT. This is the hidden blocker nobody is measuring.
Projects stalled because UAT cannot validate AI outputs
Productivity gain, cost saving, or revenue impact per project
$
How long each initiative is stalled waiting for validation capability
Cost of deploying AI without proper validation controls
$
Your Annual True Cost of Manual UAT
$0
Enter your data above to calculate
Cost Breakdown
Where the cost is hiding
⚙️
Labour Overhead
$0
🔴
Production Failures
$0
📋
Compliance Burden
$0
🤖
AI Readiness Gap
$0
Cost Distribution
Where is your money going?
Investment Comparison
Current approach vs. ATP360
Current Annual Cost
$0
Your fully loaded cost of manual UAT including labour, failures, compliance, and blocked AI value.
Estimated Cost with ATP360
$0
ATP360 eliminates the majority of labour overhead, prevents production failures through better coverage, auto-generates audit evidence, and unblocks AI initiatives.
Estimated Annual Savings by Switching to ATP360
Based on typical customer outcomes. Actual results validated during pilot.
$0
The Cost of Waiting Another Year
Every month this problem is not addressed, the meter keeps running.
$0
Lost every month your current approach continues
$0
Cost of delaying the decision by one quarter
0
Additional months your AI initiatives stay blocked