Cost of Inaction Analysis

What Is Manual UAT
Really Costing You?

Most organisations know their testing process is broken. Few have quantified what it is actually costing them across labour, failures, compliance, and AI readiness.

⚠️ Labour Cost 🔴 Release Failures 📋 Compliance Burden 🤖 AI Readiness Gap
Your Profile
Tell us about your environment
Total apps subject to UAT or validation
Full-time headcount dedicated to testing
End-to-end days per validation run
⚙️
Cost Driver 1
Labour & Manual Testing Overhead

Barclays identified this as a direct replacement for BCS Test Runner. The question is not just salary — it is the hidden cost of scripting, maintenance, and re-running failed cycles.

Include salary, benefits, overhead
$
Scripting + execution + re-runs
How many UAT runs per month across all apps
Time keeping old scripts alive vs. actual testing
🔴
Cost Driver 2
Production Failures & Release Risk

J&J highlighted packaging automation demand and governance gaps. Every failure that gets through incomplete UAT carries a direct cost — remediation, rollback, user impact, and reputational exposure.

Issues that UAT should have caught
Remediation, rollback, user impact, reputational cost
$
Planned releases that slipped because testing was not complete
Opportunity cost, SLA risk, competitive impact
$
📋
Cost Driver 3
Compliance & Audit Evidence Burden

MS Amlin specifically called out audit evidence as a pain point. Without automated audit trails, teams spend weeks manually compiling evidence before every compliance review.

SOC 2, ISO 27001, internal audits, etc.
Manual compilation, screenshots, email chains
IT + compliance + management time
$
Regulatory fines or remediation costs from audit failures
$
🤖
Cost Driver 4
AI Readiness Gap & Blocked Initiatives

M&T Bank is excited about Copilot integration and internal LLM usage — but non-deterministic AI outputs cannot be validated by manual or script-based UAT. This is the hidden blocker nobody is measuring.

Projects stalled because UAT cannot validate AI outputs
Productivity gain, cost saving, or revenue impact per project
$
How long each initiative is stalled waiting for validation capability
Cost of deploying AI without proper validation controls
$
Your Annual True Cost of Manual UAT
$0
Enter your data above to calculate
Cost Breakdown
Where the cost is hiding
⚙️
Labour Overhead
$0
🔴
Production Failures
$0
📋
Compliance Burden
$0
🤖
AI Readiness Gap
$0
Cost Distribution
Where is your money going?
Investment Comparison
Current approach vs. ATP360
Current Annual Cost
$0
Your fully loaded cost of manual UAT including labour, failures, compliance, and blocked AI value.
Estimated Cost with ATP360
$0
ATP360 eliminates the majority of labour overhead, prevents production failures through better coverage, auto-generates audit evidence, and unblocks AI initiatives.
Estimated Annual Savings by Switching to ATP360
Based on typical customer outcomes. Actual results validated during pilot.
$0
The Cost of Waiting Another Year
Every month this problem is not addressed, the meter keeps running.
$0
Lost every month your current approach continues
$0
Cost of delaying the decision by one quarter
0
Additional months your AI initiatives stay blocked
Executive Summary
Ready to share with your leadership team

Your summary will appear after calculation.

Annual UAT Cost
$0
Monthly Burn
$0
Potential Savings
$0